Make the report optional. When I get an error sometimes I don’t want to wait for the report. Just ask at the end, do you want the report.
Lots of corruption database errors. I have multiple machines, perhaps that has something to do with it. I don’t know. I know this is open-ended and without my files you can’t really help. I will start send them to you.
Put a bandwidth meter in the software so that if I use multiple machines, the grand total stays below the through-put limit rather than blowing up.
Extreme slow processing- very inconsistent on both Windows and Macs.
Even though this software is trying to make things as simple as possible, is there a way to minimize the time that the bandwidth restriction is active? For example, can we use our own MB database and search server? Can any of the processing that is tied up in the bandwidth limitation routine be pulled out and put somewhere else in the processing because it does not apply?
I started watching what this software is actually doing on the network. Sometimes it’s accessing or trying to access over 100 ip addresses according to “Little Snitch.”
What am I losing with a corrupt database? What I mean by that is the following:
Is processing more efficient when there is data in the database?
Is the quality of the data better because it has part of my collection in this database?
I am going back to just using one machine. I love the software. I hate the errors (lol). I know you told me once to run Songkong first, then run Jaikoz afterward.
I apologize if this is showing my level of frustration. I probably should write this later but will forget what I want to say.
Thanks for all that you do!