The really useful information in discogs is often in the ‘Style’ block, rather than the ‘Genre’ block, which often has meaningless generic tags such as ‘electronic’.
I’m finding that very often I am consulting discogs for Style when I want that populated in Genre. So, I have two suggestions for Discogs, one slightly more difficult than the other.
1 - Simple: Treat Discogs Style as Genre checkbox
2 - Better: Use Discogs Style as Genre if Genre is in blacklist
Discogs will often list multiple (comma delimited on the web ui, havent seen how they do it via REST) styles. stacking those into genre would be fine for my application.
I say #2 is better because it allows subspecialization as per user interest and knowledge in a branch of music. Ie, to me ‘rock’ is good enough, and the subgenres are meaningless to me, so i wouldn’t blacklist rock. To me ‘electronic’ is meaningless, and is not an acceptable categorization. Therefore, if i blacklist electronic, my tracks will be labeled appropriately as IDM, Dubstep, Psytrance, EBM, HappyHardCore, etc. If someone who doesn’t know or care much about electronic specialization doesnt blacklist ‘electronic’ but does ‘rock’, they might get their tracks labeled appropriately as Bad,Horrid,Ugly,Atonal,Yelling,Worse, or whatever rock people call their subgenres, which would make them happy.
but, i’ll take #1 too if thats all i can get.
thanks