SongKong Jaikoz

SongKong and Jaikoz Music Tagger Community Forum

Review of Jaikoz

Jaikoz is a powerful mp3 tag editor. Automation is provided by the MusicBrainz database. The license fee appears reasonably priced at �15, �1.50 of which goes to MusicBrainz.

Usability: Jaikoz performs the basic manual editing properties well. Support for more complex editing (e.g. genre, album art) is pretty poor. Getting to grip with the advanced features is quite a challenge (although on occasions worth the effort) and some of the functionality is rather counter-intuitive. For example understanding what actions are performed by “auto correct” is quite important, but difficult to grasp. A quick start guide and a shorter manual would be of benefit, but most certainly not a substitute for better design.

Performance: Jaikoz is resource hungry and requirements increase linearly based on the number of files loaded. Jaikoz recommends a minimum of 512mb of RAM, although this seems insufficient in my experience for even a modest music collection. Lots of memory is more important than processing power.

Reliability: Poor. In my opinion Jaikoz should be classed as beta. I base this decision having tagged my music collection using Jaikoz and encountered two major bugs and several annoyances, see for example:

http://www.jaikoz.net/jaikozforum/posts/list/812.page
(cause of the above http://www.jaikoz.net/jaikozforum/posts/list/795.page)
http://www.jaikoz.net/jaikozforum/posts/list/819.page
http://www.jaikoz.net/jaikozforum/posts/list/808.page

Although MusicBrainz is independent, I will mention it here as I am funding its running. In my experience the MusicBrainz server is terrible.

Support: Paul seems to be doing an excellent job!

Closing remarks. I consider Jaikoz to be a good example of beta release software. On these ground I do not feel the license fee is presently justifiable. Having said that Jaikoz has the potential to be a wonderful piece of software. However, I wonder if the current licensing model will thwart development. I would love to see Jaikoz becoming open source. Developers world-wide will no doubt collaborate to deliver a truly brilliant package. A income stream can still be obtained from open source software by licensing server side access – e.g. MusicBrainz and/or other server side services.

Well in my opinion I find the product to justify the price. I looked at all the alternatives I could find including free and pay. Jaikoz is very good value for money. I’ve had issues but compared to anything else out there it has amazing functionality.

If you wish the open source version, there is MB’s piccard. It’s free and it is fine but not nearly as good as Jaikoz.

As for MB. My only real issue with it is that Genre is all over the map. But with Jaikoz, I simply look to Discogs which is a little more sensible. Other aspects of MB have worked quite well for me.

As for resource demands. I think the comment is fair. It is an area for improvement for large collections.

Christian