Second thoughts: I have run SongKong against an album that has a total of 38 out of 40 tracks. The result is that the album was matched against an existing entry on DISCOGS and correctly identified that it has 38 out of 40 tracks found, all metadata are good, country of origin ok, catalogue good.
In the Summary Report, the first section when you hover over the initial 7 bars the result is always 38. Loaded, Album, Artwork, Songs Saved, Completed is a total waste of time in my opinion. The same applies to section 3. If you run a Song or a complete album in SK it is automatically expected that it will if find the correct release and such match everything as per available data from DISCOGS /MUSCBRAINZ. The key here is it has only “MATCHED” in the above example 38 out of 40 songs to an existing release. Which means the process is incomplete as 2 tracks are missing which means also that all the bars in the summary report incorrectly show 100% but where it should be only 95%
In the second section Song Artwork Metadata Completeness Summary only the first 2 bars are showing blue colour and again the number 38 and 100%
In the third section Song Metadata Completeness Summary all but “Original Data” are blue and show 38 and 100%
I think there is to much information in the Summary Report that is really not needed if one assumes that all data from DISCOGS/MUSICBRAINZ are correct. At the end we want to either compare existing metadata with the existing data available or correct and replace those data.
I would only make meaningful correct data available and the catalogue number linking to either/or Discogs/MUSICBRAINZ or to both if applicable.
I apologies as I have no idea if that all makes sense, I am frightened to read it again.
Cheers Thomas